(Natural News) According to a high-level Russian source with ties to the military (named in the podcast below), Russia not only possesses a devastating secret weapon against the United States; they’ve already apparently put it in place off the East Coast shoreline.
The existence of
this secret weapon — which could unleash a massive radioactive tidal wave that
devastates cities along the East Coast — has been covered by
the BBC in this article:
The Kremlin says
secret plans for a Russian long-range nuclear torpedo – called “Status-6” –
should not have appeared on Russian TV news. The leak happened during a report
on state-run Channel One about President Vladimir Putin meeting military chiefs
in the city of Sochi.
One general was
seen studying a diagram of the “devastating” torpedo system. Launched by a
submarine, it would create “wide areas of radioactive contamination”, the
document says.
The “oceanic
multi-purpose Status-6 system” is designed to “destroy important economic
installations of the enemy in coastal areas and cause guaranteed devastating
damage to the country’s territory by creating wide areas of radioactive
contamination, rendering them unusable for military, economic or other activity
for a long time”, the document says.
Nuclear Moles:
Warhead-carrying underwater drones that can be timed to unleash massive,
radioactive tidal waves of destruction
The weapon is
known as a “nuclear mole,” and it’s an underwater drone that carries a nuclear
warhead, then burrows into the seabed floor off the coast of the target
country. Once buried into the sea floor, these nuclear weapons can be remotely
detonated to cause a massive tidal wave that would wipe out coastal cities in
minutes.
I have estimated
that a series of these weapons could be detonated in a timed sequence that
multiplies the amplitude of the tidal wave, causing a much larger and more
devastating wave than any single weapon by itself.
In addition to
the physical destruction that could result from such a weapon, the tidal wave
would contain radioactive sea water, making it a “dirty bomb” in
addition to the physical destruction. The “dirty bomb” aspect of such a weapon
would deposit deadly concentrations of radioactive isotopes across the affected
cities, leaving behind a toxic legacy of radioactive elements such as
iodine-131, cesium-137 and various isotopes of uranium and plutonium, both of
which have far longer half lives than iodine (approx. 7 days) and cesium
(approx. 29 years).
Washington D.C.,
New York City, Philadelphia and Boston are all highly vulnerable to this weapon
system, as they sit very close to the U.S. coastline and are well within reach
of nuclear-initiated radioactive tidal waves.
Russia is at
least a decade ahead of the U.S. military in weapon systems innovation
Russia has also
developed many other highly innovative weapon systems that are years ahead of
the U.S. military, reports
Dave Hodges at The Common Sense Show. These include the “Plasma Fighter Jet” that
fires a plasma weapon, the “Naval Proton Gun,” the Krasuha-4, a mobile electronic
warfare system, and the S-400 Triumph, a highly advanced anti-aircraft system
that can track 300 airborne targets and fire surface-to-air missiles to almost
any imaginable aircraft height, including 40 miles of altitude (essentially
low Earth orbit).
The U.S.
military, meanwhile, was forced under Obama to focus on transgender
rights and twisted, Left-wing social experiments rooted in feminism
and LGBT agendas rather than battle readiness. America’s military, in other
words, has become a liberal “safe space” while Russians’ military has become
a dangerous fighting machine… which is, of course, the entire point
of a military force.
If this isn’t
immediately turned around under President Trump, America’s ability to fight and
win a conflict with Russia (or China, for that matter) is seriously in
question. This in no way condemns the fine men and women in the military
itself, who despised Obama’s pathetic policies. The spirit of our troops is
fully intact, and they are ecstatic that Hillary Clinton is not their Commander
in Chief. But they need our continued support and investment in weapons systems
that can compete with the innovation of Russia.
